Back to portfolio

Case study · [Company] · [Year]

[Finding the right value in a new pricing tier]

[Building a commercial offer that matched customer needs without adding unnecessary product complexity.]

My role

[Pricing strategy and launch]

Team

[X cross-functional partners]

Timeline

[X months]

Stakeholders

[Finance, Sales, Customer Success]

TL;DR for busy readers

[+$XX]

Expansion ARR

[+XX%]

Contract value

[XX%]

Tier adoption

[A single offer left growing customers underserved and made value hard to price. I led research, modelling and a limited launch of a tier designed around the segment’s most valuable use cases. The result was stronger expansion revenue with clear adoption and churn guardrails.]

01 · Context

Where the business was

[At [Company], a [stage] product in [market], customer needs had diverged as larger accounts adopted the platform. The existing plan made high-value capabilities difficult to monetise. Leadership needed a growth lever that preserved trust and avoided a disruptive repricing.]

02 · Problem

What was broken, in numbers

[Expansion had plateaued at [rate], while larger accounts asked for capabilities that smaller customers did not need. The symptom was limited revenue growth; the root cause was a mismatch between packaging and the value different segments received.]

Goal I set:

[Increase expansion ARR by [$X] while keeping churn below [X%] and preserving the existing customer promise.]

03 · Discovery

What I learned

[Used willingness-to-pay interviews, win/loss analysis, usage segmentation and scenario modelling with Finance.]

Insight 1. [Customers paid for confidence and workflow scale, not a longer list of features.]

Insight 2. [A small set of capabilities strongly differentiated the target segment.]

Insight 3. [Predictable billing was as important as the headline price.]

04 · Options & trade-offs

The decision

OptionUpsideCost / risk
[Increase the existing price][Simple to implement][Broad customer-trust risk]
[Add a value-based tier]chosen[Monetises a distinct need][Requires clear packaging]
[Move entirely to usage pricing][Price scales with adoption][Billing unpredictability]

[We chose an additional tier to preserve the core offer and test segment demand. We cut bespoke add-ons, agreed a consistent value metric, and aligned Sales and Finance on migration rules and commercial guardrails.]

05 · Solution

What we shipped

[Caption: explain the key product change shown above.]

[Shipped a new tier built around [capabilities], with clear eligibility, a comparison page and an upgrade journey. Added billing visibility so customers could understand the price before committing. Equipped Sales and Customer Success with a consistent value narrative.]

06 · Execution

How we got it out the door

  1. 01

    [Piloted with [X] accounts before broad availability, tracking adoption, expansion and cancellation intent.]

  2. 02

    [A billing edge case emerged during the pilot. We paused automatic upgrades and resolved it before expanding the rollout.]

  3. 03

    [Worked with Finance, Legal and Customer Success to establish transparent renewal and migration rules.]

07 · Results

Impact

[$X → $X]

Expansion ARR

[$X → $X]

Average contract value

[X → X%]

Tier adoption

[The tier delivered [commercial outcome] while churn remained within the agreed guardrail. Self-serve upgrades were slower than expected for [segment], suggesting that the value story needed more context before a buying decision.]

08 · Reflection

What I’d do differently

[I would test packaging language earlier alongside the pricing model. An economically sound offer still needs a value story customers immediately understand.]

[Connected customer insight to a commercial decision, while keeping the team honest about the trade-offs.]
[Name] · [Role, Company]